Showing posts with label neuroscience. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neuroscience. Show all posts

Thursday, May 14, 2015

Darwin Can Dance! The Evolution Of Pop Music

Why do most people over 40 hate today’s music? Why do your grandparents keep playing their “Malt Shop Memories” CDs? Why does your mom start dancing when she hears Wham! and your dad start nodding his head wildly when he hears Motley Crue? Why does your Uncle never shut up about how Nirvana was the greatest band ever because they "changed everything"? 

As evidenced by their song, "Do The Evolution", Pearl Jam appears to be well-versed in evolutionary theory. But was the advent of grunge the most radical change in the course of modern music history?
Despite the cliché, the song does not remain the same. Just like biological organisms, music evolves - and where there is evolution, there is science. The modern rock band, As I Lay Dying, sings it best: “The Only Constant Is Change”. 

As I Lay Dying is not the kind of music your parents are going to understand. You can hear them now as they cover their ears, “Turn off that racket! My ears are bleeding! You call that singing? He’s just screaming! Back in my day…” and so on.

Elvis Presley is commonly known as “The King of Rock and Roll” for popularizing a groundbreaking style of music in the 1950s that fused rockabilly, country, and rhythm & blues. To this day, he remains the best selling musical artist of all time, having sold in excess of 600 million records.

With this extraordinary popularity, you’d think that his type of music would still be going strong, but one look at today’s pop music chart and you’ll quickly see that there is little on there that resembles the music Elvis brought to the world. On the contrary, there are styles of music on the charts now that Elvis never could have imagined. At the time this article was written, the #1 song on the Top 100 Billboard chart is “See You Again”, which sounds nothing like the music that was popular prior to the 1990s.

While the reason remains debatable, there’s no question that music changes over time. However, our favorite music tends to be what was popular during the most impressionable years of our youth, between ages 12 and 22. Music heard during that window in our lives appears to get hardwired into our brain, forever serving as a powerful stimulus for dopamine release, a neurotransmitter that makes us feel pleasantly satisfied (perhaps "comfortably numb").

In a new study published in Royal Society Open Science, evolutionary biologists and computer scientists “come together” to advance our understanding of pop music’s evolution. The researchers analyzed 17,000 songs from the US Billboard Hot 100 charts from 1960 to 2010 in order to identify the greatest musical revolution in recent US music history. Was it the famous “British Invasion” led by the Beatles and the Rolling Stones in the 1960s?
Was it the rise of disco in the 1970s, led by the Bee Gees, Village People, and KC & the Sunshine Band, or maybe the earth-shattering hard rock of Led Zeppelin?


Could it be the rise of synth-pop and electronic music by the likes of Madonna, Duran Duran, or Howard Jones in the 1980s?

How about the meteoric rise of those late 80s hairbands like Bon Jovi, Poison, or Warrant?
Or maybe it was the gritty angst of grunge that blasted onto the scene with Nirvana, Alice in Chains, Pearl Jam, and Soundgarden?
None of the above is correct, at least according to the criteria used by the authors of the study, which employed “cutting edge methods from signal processing and text-mining to analyze the musical properties of songs. Their system automatically grouped the thousands of songs by patterns of chord changes and tone allowing researchers to statistically identify trends with an unprecedented degree of consistency.”

The biggest upheaval occurred in 1991, but not with grunge…it was with hip-hop. Starting in the mid-80s, rap and hip-hop began climbing a steady ladder to the mainstream, with the help of artists like Run-DMC, Beastie Boys, Salt-N-Pepa, and LL Cool J. But 1991 was a watershed year with huge breakthroughs for hip-hop artists like N.W.A., Ice Cube, Ice-T, 2Pac, TLC, and Public Enemy. The radical changes in lyrical content and delivery, arrangement, and the diversity of sounds culminated to make hip-hop one of the most innovative changes to music in recent history.





With these powerful tools to analyze how music has evolved over the past 50 years, one has to wonder if it is possible to predict how music might sound in 2065.

Contributed by:  Bill Sullivan

References: 


Matthias Mauch, Robert M. Maccallum, Mark Levy, Armand M. Leroi. The evolution of popular music: USA 1960–2010. Royal Society Open Science, May 2015 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150081
Salimpoor, V., Benovoy, M., Larcher, K., Dagher, A., & Zatorre, R. (2011). Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music Nature Neuroscience, 14 (2), 257-262 DOI: 10.1038/nn.2726

Thursday, April 23, 2015

And I Keep Hitting Re-peat-peat-peat-peat-peat-peat

We all do it…whether it is driving the same route to work every morning regardless of how much traffic is present, picking up your afternoon coffee/tea/soda even though you know you will need to pee on the drive home, or stopping by McDonalds for a quick bite even though the food is awful. We all have bad habits. Sometimes these habits are much easier to spot from the outside. For instance, who hasn’t questioned Selena Gomez’s habitual boyfriend choice of Justin Bieber? From the outside it seems so obvious…just quit him or it: whatever it is. But it must be more difficult than it sounds, I mean why else am I drinking my afternoon tea as I write this?


That pretty much sums it all up. I keep hittin’ re-peat-peat-peat-peat-peat-peat.
Habits, good or bad, are behaviors that have become automated. They are activities that were once goal-oriented that now occur in response to a stimulus, activities that we do without really thinking about outcomes. For example, I would get thirsty in the middle of the day after eating lunch, which led me to consciously get a drink in the afternoon. Now getting an afternoon drink has become routine – a habit. Regardless of whether I am thirsty or not, I grab a drink in the afternoon. This has become problematic as I am attempting to be healthier and drinking more water in the morning; hence my problem when I drive home.

The exact mechanisms by which a goal-oriented activity becomes a habit are not well understood. Recent studies have demonstrated a shift in brain activity: while goal-oriented, conscious activity stimulates the prefrontal cortex (the place in the brain where decisions are made), habits are traced to the basal ganglia, which plays a role in emotions, voluntary motor movements, and certain types of learning (Graybiel, 2008; Yin and Knowlton, 2006).


Well, maybe I should just grab a smaller tea, one that isn’t larger than my stomach…
So, why do we form habits? Since habits are generally formed from goal-oriented activities, we receive a reward when we perform these behaviors. For example, drinking tea quenches thirst. This reinforces the thought process in our brains leading to habit formation. But then one has to wonder: why do we maintain bad habits that don’t stimulate reward anymore?

Most of these habits, like smoking or eating junk food, once came with a reward – perhaps the idea of looking cool or a quick way to stifle hunger, respectively. Regardless of whether it may be harmful or whether your opinion changes about what is cool, once the habit is formed it is very difficult to break.

Another explanation for persistent bad habits is the concept called “sunk cost fallacy”. Sunk cost fallacy is the idea that once you have invested in something you are compelled to see it through, even if the benefit remains elusive. For example, how many of us have eaten to the point of bursting our jeans at an all-you-can-eat buffet? I know I have (it’s all you can eat, not eat all you can!). We feel we have to get the most bang for our buck, even if it means we’ll be spending more money to buy antacids later. The same concept holds true for some habits - it may be difficult to stop a habit once you have invested in that behavior. I know I will continue drinking this tea because I already bought it. Selena Gomez may feel she has already invested so much in Justin Bieber that it doesn’t seem right to just give him up.

Interestingly, studies have shown that other animals, including pigeons, are also affected by the sunk cost fallacy (White and Magalhaes, 2015). In this study, pigeons were given a reward (food) after pecking a button a few times. The scientists then introduced a second button and varied how many pecks it took to receive food, one requiring only a few pecks and the other requiring up to 30. Pigeons were more likely to stick with whichever button they initially chose, regardless of how many pecks it took to get the food. In other words, after investing in an option that works, pigeons were less likely to change course and expend energy exploring other options. So maybe we can blame our inability to break bad habits on ancient evolutionary echoes of our animal instincts?
 
Scientists have shown pigeons also fall prey to "sunk cost fallacy", providing a fertile ground for bad habits to take root.
 
Habits are routines; they are triggered by a reoccurring stimulus. So how do we break them? It is difficult to break habits because you perform them without thinking. Simply being aware of what triggers your habit will help you break it (Quinn et al., 2010). So next time you find yourself stopping at McDonalds or grabbing that unhealthy snack, think about what just happened. What triggered your desire? Force your brain not to take the short cut or easy way out, but to think objectively about your choice and the ensuing outcomes.

 
Studies have also indicated that the best time to break a habit is when you go on vacation because you are changing up your routine - you won’t have the same stimulus or trigger provoking your habit (Gross, 2012). So I guess to break my afternoon tea habit I should take a week and go to Hawaii…yeah, I like the sound of that.
 

This is where I will be until I break my tea habit. I kind of hope it takes awhile.
 
Contributed by: Sarah Deffit
 

Graybiel AM (2008). Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annual review of neuroscience, 31, 359-87 PMID: 18558860

Quinn JM, Pascoe A, Wood W, & Neal DT (2010). Can't control yourself? Monitor those bad habits. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 36 (4), 499-511 PMID: 20363904

White KG, & Magalhães P (2015). The sunk cost effect in pigeons and people: a case of within-trials contrast? Behavioural processes, 112, 22-8 PMID: 25305066

Yin HH, & Knowlton BJ (2006). The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 7 (6), 464-76 PMID: 16715055

Gross, T. Habits: How They Form And How To Break Them. NPR (2012). http://www.npr.org/2012/03/05/147192599/habits-how-they-form-and-how-to-break-them

Thursday, February 5, 2015

The Song Remains The Same

If you’re going to copy a song, best avoid one called “I Won’t Back Down”. If you’re over 40 and happened to hear the hit song “Stay With Me” by Sam Smith, you probably had a sense of déjà vu, since the song’s chorus sounds a lot like Tom Petty’s 1989 smash, “I Won’t Back Down”. The video mash-up below shows just how similar these tunes are:




Long story short, Smith claimed this was a complete coincidence, but agreed that Petty and his songwriting partner Jeff Lynne (E.L.O.) should receive co-writing credits for “Stay With Me”. Petty stated that, “these things can happen” and believes it was a “musical accident, no more no less.” Case closed.

Of course, this isn’t the first time a songwriter has been accused of borrowing heavily from a previous song. In fact, this has happened to Tom Petty at least one other time before. Not all of these disputes end on “a happy note”. If you’re curious, there is an entire web site dedicated to pointing out similarities between songs.

But should we really be surprised? There are only so many chords, isn’t there a limit to how many ways they can be strung together? Moreover, our ears are turned on by certain chord progressions, further limiting the combinations an artist can chose from if he/she wants a lot of listeners to enjoy the tune.

In addition to the limited combination of chords that sound pleasing to our ears, some musical genres also suffer from coming up with original lyrical content. This phenomenon was illustrated by a recent demonstration of how modern country songs sound exactly the same. Not to single out country - other musical genres are also guilty of churning out songs in cookie-cutter fashion...and science has found an explanation for this.

First, let's consider how many possible songs can be written. This has actually been calculated and you math fans can check it out here. For the rest of us, the calculation shows that the number of possible 5 minute songs is 2 to the 211 million power, which is a gargantuan number way more than even the total number of hydrogen atoms in our universe. Applying additional filters, such as limiting the octave and the number of notes to those most commonly used, there are still 79 billion possible combinations. Watch Vsauce break it down:


With so many possible songs that could be written, why do chart toppers usually sound the same? For a song to resonate with a large number of people, it has to balance our competing desires for predictability and unpredictability. This was perhaps best articulated by the composer Arnold Schönberg, who held that music must meet “the demand for repetition of pleasant stimuli, and the opposing desire for variety, for change, for a new stimulus.”

Trying to address why simplicity sells, scientists have found that music becomes “increasingly formulaic in terms of instrumentation under increasing sales numbers due to a tendency to popularize music styles with low variety and musicians with similar skills. Only a small number of styles in popular music manage to sustain a high level of instrumentational complexity over an extended period of time.”

Which style of music has had the longest legs in sustained complexity and popularity in musical history? Drum roll…folk rock.

Contributed by:  Bill Sullivan



Juslin PN (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of life reviews, 10 (3), 235-66 PMID: 23769678 Percino, G., Klimek, P., & Thurner, S. (2014).

Instrumentational Complexity of Music Genres and Why Simplicity Sells PLoS ONE, 9 (12) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115255

Friday, November 7, 2014

The Friday Five

Highlighting some of the coolest science news we’ve seen lately.

1. Ever get the feeling that your brain is slowing down? When people say, “Think fast!”, you usually respond in a day or two? Perhaps you’ve been infected by an algal virus (especially if you live in the Baltimore area where this study was conducted). A virus (ATCV-1) that typically infects green algae can also infect human brain tissue, and now a study has shown a link in those who are infected with slowed brain activity.

This algal virus can infect people too, and may make them slower on the draw with shorter attention spans.
 
2. Do you think you know the primary colors? How about the number of senses that we have? You might be surprised at the true answers. Read on to learn the truth about five things we were taught in science class.

3. Everyone’s favorite attraction at the fair is the daring performer who eats and breathes fire. In the video below, you can learn the chemistry behind fire eating and why the performers don’t melt their faces off.
 



4. Thanks to lessons from computer science, it may be possible to “debug” our brains in ways that parallel how programmers edit bad code. Read it now before you get distra---oh, look, a squirrel!

 
5. And now…5 of the craziest science stunts that teachers won’t show you in school. Except maybe this teacher.

 


Science quote of the week:
“Exploring the unknown requires tolerating uncertainty.” –Brian Greene

Contributed by:  Bill Sullivan
Follow Bill on Twitter: @wjsullivan

Yolken, R., Jones-Brando, L., Dunigan, D., Kannan, G., Dickerson, F., Severance, E., Sabunciyan, S., Talbot, C., Prandovszky, E., Gurnon, J., Agarkova, I., Leister, F., Gressitt, K., Chen, O., Deuber, B., Ma, F., Pletnikov, M., & Van Etten, J. (2014). Chlorovirus ATCV-1 is part of the human oropharyngeal virome and is associated with changes in cognitive functions in humans and mice Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418895111

Friday, October 17, 2014

The Friday Five

Highlighting some of the coolest science news we’ve seen lately.

1. People living with type I diabetes may have something to celebrate as scientists have successfully used human embryonic stem cells to generate beta cells. These insulin-producing cells could one day be transplanted into humans.


2. How do you ward off the obnoxious guy who won’t leave you alone in a bar? Female squid of the species Doryteuthis opalescens can steer males away by turning on fake testes. Interestingly, when the females turn on the testes, they also get a pay raise at work.

Since human females can’t turn on testes like a squid, a fake moustache might be sufficient to keep unwanted men away.
3. Blinded by the light? Neuroscientists have successfully erased specific memories in mice…using light. But they are not using this knowledge for evil, they used it to demonstrate how different parts of the brain - the hippocampus and cortex - work together to retrieve memories.

Bono remembers everything about the ‘90s because he adequately shielded his eyes from the light.
4. Still “cleaning” your ears with Q-tip swabs? Learn more about your ear wax and why you should not interfere with it.

5. Check out these amazing photos of flowers that look like other things.

A kiss from a rose...
Science quote of the week:

“Science moves with the spirit of an adventure characterized both by youthful arrogance and by the belief that the truth, once found, would be simple as well as pretty.” – James D. Watson

Contributed by:  Bill Sullivan
Follow Bill on Twitter: @wjsullivan

Tanaka, K., Pevzner, A., Hamidi, A., Nakazawa, Y., Graham, J., & Wiltgen, B. (2014). Cortical Representations Are Reinstated by the Hippocampus during Memory Retrieval Neuron DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.037

DeMartini DG, Ghoshal A, Pandolfi E, Weaver AT, Baum M, & Morse DE (2013). Dynamic biophotonics: female squid exhibit sexually dimorphic tunable leucophores and iridocytes. The Journal of experimental biology, 216 (Pt 19), 3733-41 PMID: 24006348

Pagliuca, F., Millman, J., Gürtler, M., Segel, M., Van Dervort, A., Ryu, J., Peterson, Q., Greiner, D., & Melton, D. (2014). Generation of Functional Human Pancreatic β Cells In Vitro Cell, 159 (2), 428-439 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.040

Friday, September 5, 2014

The Friday Five

Highlighting some of the coolest science news we’ve seen lately.

1. The mystery behind Death Valley's 'Wandering Stones' appears to have finally been solved. For decades scientists have debated why hundreds of rocks move across Racetrack Playa, leaving trails behind them. Read this and/or watch the video below to see how this happens.


2. We’ve recently covered some of the things that alcohol does to your brain in this post. Here is a short video that not only addresses the question, “Does alcohol kill brain cells?”, but also explains where this notion originated. Cheers!


3. Now that we know what alcohol does, how about coffee? What does coffee do to the brain? AsapSCIENCE is here to explain in this short video.


4. Economist Richard Reeves uses Legos to demonstrate the chances of upward mobility in America.


5. Richard Feynman’s famous lectures are now available for free here. Go learn some physics from the master who had a knack for making complex principles understandable and entertaining.



Science quote of the week:

“Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition.” –Adam Smith

Contributed by:  Bill Sullivan
Follow Bill on Twitter: @wjsullivan

Norris, R., Norris, J., Lorenz, R., Ray, J., & Jackson, B. (2014). Sliding Rocks on Racetrack Playa, Death Valley National Park: First Observation of Rocks in Motion PLoS ONE, 9 (8) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105948

Monday, August 18, 2014

State Fairs and Stiff Beers: Why We Can't Stop Drinking

Recently, the Indiana State Fair served its first alcoholic beverage since 1946. With the popularity of local breweries and wineries on the rise in Indiana – nearly a hundred of each in the Hoosier State – a reversal of the near-70 year alcohol drought at the State Fair seemed inevitable.

The logo for the Beer and Wine Exhibit 2014 at the Indiana State Fair
Meanwhile, in Indiana and beyond, many scientists are buzzing about trying to understand exactly what alcohol does to our brain. From time to time, researchers lace a rodent’s drinking water with varying amounts of ethanol in order to observe how this impacts their zig-zagging through mazes. Despite consuming alcohol for millennia, we remain remarkably ill-informed regarding how alcohol affects the nervous system. Why do we consume alcohol? How does it affect us neurologically in the short-term, and why do we keep going back for more? The answers are complex, but we are beginning to see them without beer goggles.

Going back at least to 8,000 B.C., the pages of history are splashed with examples of alcohol usage, the reasons ranging from medicinal (analgesic and antiseptic), religious (Communion wine), aesthetic (perfumes and cosmetics), preservative (safeguarding of food), industrial (fossil fuels), financial (barter) and recreational (drinking in times of merriment and sorrow to alter one’s mood).  The mighty powers behind constructing the Pyramids of Giza rationed payments for their laborers in measures of beer. The Middle Ages and well beyond saw numerous reports of alcohol (primarily beer) being safer to drink than water - until the Germ Theory of Disease helped make two parts of hydrogen and one part oxygen safe to imbibe. The Royal Navy of the United Kingdom received a daily rum ration until the 1970s, when someone of importance finally became worried that operating heavy machinery might be precarious while under the influence.

Many, then, are the uses of alcohol, and diverse are instances of its enduring consumption, inherent in legions of cultures for thousands of years. For all the other ways in which the world has changed, in some ways the consumption of alcohol seems little different today. As in ancient and medieval times, we drink to please others and we drink to please ourselves.

While the liver is the key organ that metabolizes alcohol, the majority of the effects we feel after having thrown back a few (or a few too many, depending on the occasion) are primarily neurological. It is important to understand that alcohol is more than simply a depressant. Alcohol is a complex drug that causes variable effects based on the amount ingested. It affects a variety of neurological pathways and targets different structures in the brain, resulting in a cocktail of symptoms not easily explained by a single molecular alteration. After minutes of ingestion, alcohol enters the blood stream and readily crosses the blood-brain barrier, typically a highly selective barrier between the circulating blood and brain fluid, and acts on a number of receptors both directly and indirectly. Even moderate alcohol consumption can have adverse effects on sleep patterns and temperature regulation, which is controlled by a small almond-shaped structure located just above the brainstem known as the hypothalamus. While a nightcap may help you feel drowsy, larger quantities of alcohol affect REM sleep, causing restlessness and wakefulness through the course of the night.

Those who have had too much are afflicted with cerebellar defects, such as difficulty walking and impaired motor coordination. Alcohol can also do a number on the cerebral cortex, which is responsible for judgment, cognition, planning, and social interaction. Some reports suggest that alcohol can bind up to 100 independent receptors in the brain, and the various locations of these processes in the cranium determine the specific changes in behavior. Other symptoms associated with drinking include changes in memory and emotion, slurred speech, and blackouts. Small to moderate quantities of alcohol have also been reported to decrease brain volume. 



Low and moderate alcohol users show a decrease in adjusted brain volume based on magnetic resonance imaging results in the Framingham Offspring Study cohort (Paul et al. JAMA Neurology 2008)

Alcohol also alters the release of numerous neuro-transmitters and neuropeptides, which are chemical messengers and protein-like molecules, respectively, involved in transmitting signals in the brain. For example, alcohol decreases the release of glutamate, the key excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, while increasing the amount of GABA, an inhibitory neurotransmitter, potentially resulting in a slowdown of brain function. All these consequences seem negative, but there’s a catch:  booze increases the production of dopamine in the “reward center” of the brain. This creates a positive feedback loop, making us want more and more of this elixir.

A number of different structures in the brain are affected by the consumption of alcohol. In particular, the ‘pleasure center’ is responsible for the effects of the dopamine reward pathway and the limbic system can lead to changes in memory and emotion

Indeed, there are a number of reasons why libations are such a central part of our life. Here’s a small excerpt. First and foremost, we like it! This pleasure can be explained neurologically by the activation of the dopamine-reward pathway, socially by the fact that it is an event that often brings people together (be it in times of merriment or sorrow), and psychologically by how it is a low risk/high reward activity and relieves stress, helping one cope with emotional turmoil. 

If viewed from an evolutionary perspective, moderate alcohol consumption hardly affects fitness: Although the Porter in Shakespeare’s Macbeth says that drink “provokes the desire but takes away the performance,” science tells us that alcohol can bolster both. So spirits, unlike the painful fear of heights, seem no powerful threat to either survival or procreation. Additionally, the “drunken monkey” hypothesis put forth by Dr. Robert Dudley suggests that we drink because we associate alcohol with a nutritional reward, as our anthropoid ancestors primarily subsisted on ripe fruits that contained low levels of ethanol. Since moderate and chronic alcoholism are associated with a number of vitamin deficiencies, such as folate, vitamin B12, vitamin A, and calcium, I have difficulty believing that alcohol consumption is, in fact, an evolutionary hangover, but this argument has been made from time to time. However, as with most things in life, consuming alcohol in moderation can maximize its positive effects while minimizing the risk associated with consumption.

So as you weave your way to the Grand Hall to the Beer and Wine exhibition at the State Fair, right after having scarfed down your deep-fried Twinkie and a few shucks of corn, if you down that beer (or three, the limit imposed at the State Fair this year), it won’t be because you have to. You’ll swill that brew because you want to.

Contributed by:  Aarti Chawla

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/
Diamond I, & Messing RO (1994). Neurologic effects of alcoholism. The Western journal of medicine, 161 (3), 279-87 PMID: 7975567

Németh Z, Kuntsche E, Urbán R, Farkas J, & Demetrovics Z (2011). Why do festival goers drink? Assessment of drinking motives using the DMQ-R SF in a recreational setting. Drug and alcohol review, 30 (1), 40-6 PMID: 21219496

Paul CA, Au R, Fredman L, Massaro JM, Seshadri S, Decarli C, & Wolf PA (2008). Association of alcohol consumption with brain volume in the Framingham study. Archives of neurology, 65 (10), 1363-7 PMID: 18852353