Showing posts with label Diet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Diet. Show all posts

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Bugs To Drugs: Can Probiotics Treat Depression?


Depression is a debilitating mental illness that affects up to 15 million Americans in the US alone, yet we are far from understanding the root cause. Multiple genes have been associated with depression, but whether these genes produce symptoms depends on the individual’s environment. New research is showing that one of the biggest environmental factors impinging on mental health comes from within.

Our body is home to trillions of microscopic creatures, mostly bacteria, which are collectively referred to as our microbiota. As unsettling as that may sound, these microbes are not necessarily the kind we want to evict from our body. The bacteria dwelling within our gut serve many important functions; for example, they help digestion, produce vitamins, and keep other types of microbes that cause disease at bay.

Our microbial inhabitants bring countless additional genes into our body called the “microbiome.” These microbial genes can be considered an extension of our own DNA – a so-called “second genome.” In other words, your body is not only influenced by the genes in your DNA, but it can also be affected by genes carried by your microbiota. These microbial genes not only affect physical health, but may also alter your mood and personality.


It is convenient to refer to species of our microbiota as "good" or "bad", but in reality they are neither. There are bacteria that can cause serious disease, like C-diff, but usually only after the microbiota has been disrupted (e.g. after prolonged antibiotic treatment). Likewise, "good" bacteria like E. coli can cause life-threatening disease under the right circumstances.  
Our microbiota help produce surprising amounts of neurotransmitters – chemicals that function in brain signaling. When laboratories produce “germ-free” mice by raising them in sterile environments, the mice exhibit strange neurological issues. Lacking their gut microbiota, germ-free mice do not respond to stress properly. These studies have given rise to the concept of the “gut-brain” axis, a conduit of biochemical communication between these organ systems. Such an axis exists in people too, as researchers have noted a strong correlation between intestinal problems and mental illness. For example, anxiety and depressive disorders are associated with both irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis.

A study by Ioana A. Marin and colleagues at the University of Virginia, published on March 7, 2017 in Scientific Reports, provides new evidence that intestinal bacteria influence mental disorders such as depression. In this experiment, mice were subjected to unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS), which involves strobe lights, irritating noise, cage tilting, and crowded conditions. Kind of like being shoved into noxious nightclubs against your will at random times throughout the day.

Unlike Disco Mickey, laboratory mice become stressed out when subjected to stimuli that resemble your average nightclub.
Over time, mice subjected to UCMS begin to show symptoms that resemble depression in humans. The researchers look for “despair behavior,” which can be detected in a number of ways. In this study, the mice were placed in a tub of water to evaluate despair behavior. Unstressed mice quickly swam to a platform and escaped, but the stressed mice did not make a strong effort to escape and had to be rescued from the tub.

The researchers then compared what the intestinal microbiome looked like in stressed versus unstressed mice. The different species of bacteria comprising the microbiota can be determined by sequencing the DNA in mouse droppings. Each species has a signature DNA sequence that serves as an identifier for that type of bacteria.

The results showed that stress altered the mouse microbiome by reducing a type of bacteria called Lactobacillus. It might have occurred to you that stress could have simply changed the eating habits of the mice, which in turn would affect the composition of the microbiome, but the researchers did not observe any change in eating habits or weight of the stressed mice. Furthermore, when they administered Lactobacillus as a probiotic, the symptoms of depression improved.

Why would stress cause changes in the microbiome? No one knows for sure, but this could be a result of altered brain chemistry making the gut less hospitable to some bacteria. Researchers also noted that intestinal physiology was altered in the stressed animals, which could have played a role in microbiota changes.


When someone consumes a probiotic they are ingesting live bacteria. That concept should no longer gross you out. Probiotics include the so-called "good" bacteria that have been shown to confer health benefits in some studies. These bacteria can be delivered into your body in numerous ways, including food (like yogurt) or pills.  
Does this mean you should rush out to purchase probiotics to battle depression? There are important caveats to studies like this that should be considered. The study was performed in a mouse model of depression, which may not fully represent the condition in humans. The microbiome of controlled laboratory animals is more uniform than humans, who tend to have vastly different bacteria in their guts depending on such things as diet, geography, illness, and age.

However, a 2016 meta-analysis (a study of studies) concluded that “probiotics were associated with a significant reduction in depression [in humans], underscoring the need for additional research on this potential preventive strategy for depression.” While that sounds encouraging, we are far from understanding how certain bacteria may ameliorate depression and whether this affect holds up in diverse patient populations. Probiotics certainly should not replace the more rigorously established treatments for depression recommended by health professionals.

Bill Sullivan is a professor at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Follow him on Twitter @wjsullivan.

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Biting Off More Than You Can Chew: The Science of Competitive Eating

Take a look at the woman in the photograph below. That’s Sonya Thomas, one of the world’s greatest competitive eaters. According to Major League Eating (yes, there is such a thing!), Sonya has been devouring eating records since 2003. Some of her “main course” achievements include the following (and if these whet your appetite, go here for a complete listing):

- Lobster: 44 Maine Lobsters (11.3 Pounds of meat) from the shell in 12 minutes
- Hamburgers: 7 Burgers (3/4 pound) "Thickburgers" in 10 minutes
- Crab Cakes: 46 Phillips Crab Cakes in 10 Minutes
- Cherrystone Clams: 26 dozen in 6 minutes
- Cheesecake: 11 pounds Downtown Atlantic Cheesecake in 9 minutes


At 44 years of age and just 105 pounds, it might surprise you to learn Sonya Thomas can eat more in one sitting than some people consume in a week.
 
You are probably wondering how a petite woman like Sonya can pack away pounds of food in the same amount of time it takes to microwave a Hungry Man entrĂ©e. She is just one of a collection of elite gobblers that defy all logic with the speed and quantity of food they seem to inhale rather than ingest. Very recently, Matt “Megatoad” Stonie broke the record for bacon – he managed to stuff 182 slices (about 6 pounds) of the pork candy into his slim frame in just 5 minutes. We don’t want to know what he ate in order to acquire his nickname.
 
 
What is it about these competitive eaters that make them such efficient food vacuums? The question interested several researchers at The University of Pennsylvania several years ago, who performed live imaging of the stomach of a competitive eater engaged in what he does best. For comparison, a non-competitive eater was also imaged while gorging on as much food as he could.

The results reveal why you can’t spot a competitive eater on the street without a portable fluoroscope. There are no obvious physical attributes that mark a competitive eater. Rather, competitive eaters have a unique and extraordinary ability to expand the stomach to form “an enormous flaccid sac capable of accommodating huge amounts of food.”

Judge me by my size, do you? Size has nothing to do with the ability to stuff oneself silly. In fact, Yoda was a competitive eater prior to becoming a Jedi until Jabba the Hutt accused him of using The Force to choke his opponents.

 
Under normal circumstances, nerves in the stomach should signal to the brain when it is full, at which point the food moves along down the digestive pipeline into the small intestine. Due to a genetic predisposition, training, or a combination of those two factors, the stomach of a competitive eater will expand rather than process food. The study found that the control subject sent 75% of the meal (hot dogs in this case) into the small intestine by two hours after intake. But the competitive eater only processed 25% of the meal by that time, the bulk of it remaining in something that more closely resembled Santa’s sack of toys than a normal stomach.

The stomach of a competitive eater (right) has an unusual ability to stretch and expand far beyond what occurs in most people when they stuff themselves (left).
 
The authors of the study expressed concern that competitive eaters can’t have their cake and eat it too:  “We speculate that professional speed eaters eventually may develop morbid obesity, profound gastroparesis, intractable nausea and vomiting, and even the need for a gastrectomy. Despite its growing popularity, competitive speed eating is a potentially self-destructive form of behavior.”

While competitive eaters may enjoy fame and fortune (not to mention a lot of free food), living with such an elastic stomach that cannot properly signal when it is full is a double-edged steak knife. Normal mealtime can be a challenge because the competitive eater never reaches that satisfied feeling most people experience. Some competitive eaters weigh out their food and discipline themselves to eat no more than the designated portion.

 
It is all-too-common for today’s restaurants to challenge us with a ridiculously oversized menu item. These guys might get their picture on the wall for consuming this monstrosity, but they’ll likely regret it in the morning.
 
What makes our bodies feel full after a meal is another can of noodles, and an area of intense investigation. Current studies suggest that digestion triggers release of hormones that inform the brain that food is being consumed. When they reach a certain level, the brain tells us to stop munching. The signaling can take 10-20 minutes, which is problematic if you are a fast eater and/or the food is really tasty. Due to the delayed signaling, it is rather easy for us to overeat if there is enough food to do so. This is why some argue that a healthy diet is governed by portion size as much as the type of food you eat.
 
 

Contributed by:  Bill Sullivan
 
 
Levine MS, Spencer G, Alavi A, & Metz DC (2007). Competitive speed eating: truth and consequences. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 189 (3), 681-6 PMID: 17715117

Friday, November 14, 2014

The Friday Five

Highlighting some of the coolest science news we’ve seen lately.

1. Paleo, Atkins, raw, juice...diets, diets, diets! Sort the fact from the fiction with this excellent article, “10 Fad Diets, Debunked”, by Esther Inglis-Arkell.


2. The new film odyssey, Interstellar, blasted into theatres recently. Director Christopher Nolan went to great lengths to try and get the science right in the movie, which included consultation with theoretical physicist Kip Thorne. The video below details how they worked together to imagine a real black hole.




Unfortunately, not all of the science in the movie is accurate

3. In this week's episode of “The Big Question”, Craig Benzine explains why your voice gets higher when you inhale helium. Interestingly, it is not the pitch that changes…



4. Here, kitty kitty…what’s the difference between a wildcat and a domesticated one? Nothing – they both hate you. Jokes aside, scientists have recently performed a genetic comparison between the two and found a number of genes that were enriched due to domestication. These genes may explain why your housecat is less shy, tamer, and more responsive to a reward. Interpreted another way, they also explain why we can't really stroll through the woods with tigers.


5. Our ongoing coverage of new species named after celebrities converged with another subject that constantly fascinates us: Ozzy Osbourne. A new species of frog was recently found in Brazil and named Dendropsophus ozzyi. The males have a bat-like mating call, which reminded the researchers of the infamous concert when Ozzy bit the head off a bat during the show.

Scientists named this new species of frog after Ozzy because it makes a bat-like noise, which reminded them of Ozzy's strange stage diet in the 1980s.

Science quote of the week:

"Science fiction has become science fact today - Hollywood is good, but Rosetta is better" –Dr. David Parker, in reference to the first time humans have landed a probe on a comet.

Contributed by:  Bill Sullivan

Follow Bill on Twitter: @wjsullivan


ORRICO, V., PELOSO, P., STURARO, M., SILVA-FILHO, H., NECKEL-OLIVEIRA, S., GORDO, M., FAIVOVICH, J., & HADDAD, C. (2014). A new “Bat-Voiced” species of Dendropsophus Fitzinger, 1843 (Anura, Hylidae) from the Amazon Basin, Brazil Zootaxa, 3881 (4) DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3881.4.3

  Montague, M., Li, G., Gandolfi, B., Khan, R., Aken, B., Searle, S., Minx, P., Hillier, L., Koboldt, D., Davis, B., Driscoll, C., Barr, C., Blackistone, K., Quilez, J., Lorente-Galdos, B., Marques-Bonet, T., Alkan, C., Thomas, G., Hahn, M., Menotti-Raymond, M., O'Brien, S., Wilson, R., Lyons, L., Murphy, W., & Warren, W. (2014). Comparative analysis of the domestic cat genome reveals genetic signatures underlying feline biology and domestication Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1410083111